Cocktail Party Effect
The cocktail party effect refers to the phenomenon where people at a noisy party can focus on a single conversation despite the surrounding noise. This effect is an example of selective perception or selective attention, where individuals concentrate on meaningful information while ignoring the irrelevant background. This phenomenon is also known as the self-referential effect, banquet effect, or party effect .
Background
The cocktail party effect was first reported by E.C. Cherry. Although the term was coined to describe party behavior, most early research on this phenomenon aimed to aid air traffic controllers in the early 1950s. At that time, controllers had to listen to multiple pilots speaking through a central loudspeaker, making it difficult to perform their tasks accurately when multiple voices were heard simultaneously.
In May 2012, an American research team scientifically demonstrated that the cocktail party effect is related to brain activity. They observed through brain spectrograms that a person could respond to a single voice among many.
Principle
The cocktail party effect occurs because, although the brain receives various voices, it selectively processes only one. A research team from the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) studied the brain activity of individuals listening to two voices simultaneously. They identified neuron groups that responded specifically to certain voice frequencies and gathered enough information to develop an algorithm that converts brain activity into a spectrogram.
The researchers investigated the cocktail party effect in volunteers, including three epilepsy patients, by playing recordings of a man and a woman speaking different sentences simultaneously. The participants were instructed to focus on a specific voice upon hearing a particular word. Initially, each participant focused on only one voice, but upon hearing the keyword, their brain exclusively processed the voice that mentioned it. This experiment confirmed the saying, "people hear what they want to hear"
Related Examples
Example 1: The Inapplicability to Noise from Upstairs Neighbors
The concept of the cocktail party effect is often erroneously applied to mitigate noise from upstairs neighbors, known as inter-floor noise. There are two main reasons why this is not effective:
- Inadequate Noise Control: Efforts to cope with inter-floor noise, such as playing music or focusing on personal activities, have proven insufficient. The stress caused by such noise has, in extreme cases, led to violent confrontations. Consequently, it has been established through numerous practical examples that the cocktail party effect cannot adequately address inter-floor noise.
- Difficulty in Meaningful Perception: For the cocktail party effect to apply, it must be possible to focus selectively on meaningful words or sounds. Inter-floor noise, which reverberates through concrete, often lacks discernible meaning. The purpose of such noise is not to convey meaning but rather results from normal living activities, inadvertently causing inconvenience to others. Therefore, inter-floor noise, lacking malicious intent, cannot be processed meaningfully, making it unsuitable as an example of the cocktail party effect.
Example 2: Enhancing Focus in Class through Previewing
Another way to leverage the cocktail party effect is through previewing before classes. In a noisy cocktail party, we tend to focus on words and sounds we are familiar with or interested in. Similarly, if a student previews the material before class, they are more likely to focus and understand the lesson because the content is already somewhat familiar. However, previewing should not be overly thorough; a light review that distinguishes between known and unknown content is sufficient. This approach ensures that students are prepared to understand critical information during the lesson without becoming overwhelmed or losing interest.
'Psychology' 카테고리의 다른 글
The Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE) - Lucifer Effect (0) | 2024.06.19 |
---|---|
The Broken Windows Theory (0) | 2024.06.19 |
MBTI (0) | 2024.06.19 |
Psychological testing (0) | 2024.06.19 |
Barnum effect (0) | 2024.06.19 |